• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

EPJ Web of Conferences • 2021

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Microbial Cell Factories • 2010

• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Biomedicines • 2021

• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

ACS Catalysis • 2019

• 0

• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Microbial Cell Factories • 2022

Electro-fermentation (EF) is an emerging tool for bioprocess intensification. Benefits are especially expected for bioprocesses in which the cells are enabled to exchange electrons with electrode surfaces directly. It has also been demonstrated that the use of electrical energy in BES can increase bioprocess performance by indirect secondary effects. In this case, the electricity is used to alter process parameters and indirectly activate desired pathways. In many bioprocesses, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) is a crucial process parameter. While C. pasteurianum fermentation of glycerol has been shown to be significantly influenced electrochemically, the underlying mechanisms are not clear. To this end, we developed a system for the electrochemical control of ORP in continuous culture to quantitatively study the effects of ORP alteration on C. pasteurianum by metabolic flux analysis (MFA), targeted metabolomics, sensitivity and regulation analysis.

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Trakya Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi • 2023

• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object]

Journal of Membrane Science • 2023

[object Object], [object Object]

Advances in Microbiology • 2014

• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Entropy • 2021

[object Object]

3D Printing in Medicine • 2023

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Health care science • 2024

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Research Square • 2022

Abstract Background A processing methodology of raw starch extraction from avocado seeds (ASs) and a sequential hydrolysis and fermentation bioprocess in just a few steps was successfully obtained for the bioethanol production by a single yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain and this research was also to investigate the optimum conditions for the pretreatment of biomass and technical procedures for the production of bioethanol. It successfully resulted in high yields and productivity of all the experiments from the laboratory scale and the pilot plant. Ethanol yields from pretreated starch are comparable with those in commercial industries that use molasses and hydrolyzed starch as raw materials. Results Before the pilot-scale bioethanol production, studies of starch extraction and dilute sulfuric acid-based pretreatment was carefully conducted. The amount of starch extracted from dry and fresh avocado seed was 16.85 g ± 0.34 g and 29.79 ± 3.18 g of dry starch, representing a yield of ∼17 % and 30 %, respectively. After a dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of starch, the released reducing sugars (RRS) were obtained and the hydrolysate slurries containing glucose (109.79 ± 1.14 g/L), xylose (0.99 ± 0.06 g/L), and arabinose (0.38 ± 0.01 g/L). The efficiency of total sugar conversion was 73.40 %, with a productivity of 9.26 g/L/h. The ethanol fermentation in a 125 mL flask fermenter showed that Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Fali, active dry yeast) produced the maximum ethanol concentration, pmax at 49.05 g/L (6.22% v/v) with a yield coefficient, Yp/s of 0.44 gEthanol/gGlucose, a productivity or production rate, rp at 2.01 g/L/h and an efficiency, Ef of 85.37%. The pilot scale experiments of the ethanol fermentation using the 40-L fermenter were also successfully achieved with essentially good results. The values of pmax, Yp/s, rp, and Ef of the 40-L scale were at 50.94 g/L (6.46% v/v), 0.45 gEthanol/gGlucose, 2.11 g/L/h, and 88.74%, respectively. Because of using raw starch, major by-products, i.e., acetic acid in the two scales were very low, in ranges of 0.88–2.45 g/L, and lactic acid was not produced, which are less than those values in the industries. Conclusion The sequential hydrolysis and fermentation process of two scales for ethanol production using the combination of hydrolysis by utilizing dilute sulfuric acid-based pretreatment and fermentation by a single yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain is practicable and feasible for realistic and effective scale-up strategies of bioethanol production from the starch of avocado seeds.

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object]

Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology • 2018

• 0

• 0

• 0

• 0

• 0

• 0

[object Object]

• 2021

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Sensors • 2023

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Metabolic Engineering • 2019

The last four years have brought exciting progress in membrane protein research. Finally those many efforts that have been put into expression of eukaryotic membrane proteins are coming to fruition and enable to solve an ever-growing number of high resolution structures. In the past, many skilful optimization steps were required to achieve sufficient expression of functional membrane proteins. Optimization was performed individually for every membrane protein, but provided insight about commonly encountered bottlenecks and, more importantly, general guidelines how to alleviate cellular limitations during microbial membrane protein expression. Lately, system-wide analyses are emerging as powerful means to decipher cellular bottlenecks during heterologous protein production and their use in microbial membrane protein expression has grown in popularity during the past months.This review covers the most prominent solutions and pitfalls in expression of eukaryotic membrane proteins using microbial hosts (prokaryotes, yeasts), highlights skilful applications of our basic understanding to improve membrane protein production. Omics technologies provide new concepts to engineer microbial hosts for membrane protein production.

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Frontiers in Microbiology • 2016

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object]

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences • 2014

• 0

• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object]

• 2025

• 0

• 0

[object Object], [object Object], [object Object] et al.

Nutrients • 2020

[object Object], [object Object]

Global Change Biology • 2023

• 0

[object Object]

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences • 2023